Carolyn Rowlett

Emotional/Behavioral should include an executive functioning component. But you can ask this question to be sure. As far as the "oral testing" for special education, the school has to go by the testing protocols. If they allow for oral testing, then you shouldn't need to sign anything. I wouldn't sign anything that allows them to change the test protocols.

Ok. It seems we were confused and thought you were referring to the special education testing when you said "oral testing." But you mean the school wants to give her oral, rather than written, tests in the classroom because of her ADHD. I haven't heard of this being something to consider for students with ADHD, but maybe because it "forces" them to stay focused more than if they're sitting in front of paper or a computer taking a test? Whatever the reason, I would ask them to explain their thought process on this change - whether you ask for that in an email or during a meeting. You did say her grades are dropping, so it could be in response to that? Since you are wanting a behavioral plan, I would ask that the emotional/behavioral testing include an FBA (Functional Behavior Assessment).

What areas are checked on the consent form to be evaluated? That could make a difference. I would also ask what evaluations are being used for each area and then look up online to see if an oral version is appropriate.

In my opinion, they're exposing themselves to a different type of liability by preventing a child from accessing FAPE when there is not a documented medical reason for the child having to stay home. Yes, get everything in writing and the reasons behind the decision, as well as share everything JSD24 points out. But I would include the IEP on your emails (do they even know the nurse told you this?), and I would request an IEP meeting to figure out the educational plan moving forward (and if even needed) because the nurse doesn't seem to have a good one.

With respect to not receiving the progress monitoring reports timely, I would suggest reaching out to the director of spec ed and informing him/her about this. I would also inform him/her about the accommodations not being followed. If both of these continue to occur, they are grounds for filing a state complaint for not following the IEP. But give the spec ed department a chance to correct first. As far as the accommodations, I would look closely at how they are worded. Do they state student "will" be provided such and such accommodation. In that case, the gen ed teacher doesn't have the right to only give an accommodation if the student asks for it. That would be a team decision and the language in the IEP would need to be changed. Alternatively, do the accommodations state "as needed" or "if requested by student." If so, I would ask (first in an email, then request a team meeting if they won't change via email) that the language be changed to not putting the onus on the student in order to receive the accommodations because he lacks the self-advocacy skills. That is a skill the team will want the student to master, but if he hasn't mastered it yet, his accommodations should not be withheld from him because he lacks this skill. You can even ask for a goal for self-advocacy - but in the meantime, the skill should not be expected to magically be there. Regarding an IEE, all you have to do is state you disagree with the school's evaluation in the areas of x, y, z. Or you can state in all areas evaluated by the school. You can even list areas you think they should have evaluated in, but didn't. You can give reasons why you disagree, but it is not required. I would keep in very general. As far as the school district saying "no" to an IEE, that rarely happens because they have to either agree to it or take you to due process to show why an IEE is not needed. Because of this, school districts, practically without exception, choose to allow the IEE. The school district will give you a list of approved providers, but you are also free to choose your own. See more about IEEs by clicking on the link below. https://adayinourshoes.com/iee-independent-education-evaluation/

Definitely send a follow up email setting forth what you don't agree with in the IEP and your reasons why. Also ask for a PWN for all the changes they made to the IEP and anything you requested that they denied (and outline each change/denial specifically - that way you document it without having a PWN, in case they refuse to give you one). Also state that you expect the IEP to be followed in the area of progress monitoring so that you receive these reports concurrent with grade cards (if that is what the IEP states). If you don't like the data in the progress monitoring, reach out and ask for clarification or more data. You could even request an IEP meeting to go over it. It sounds to me like you need an IEE (Independent Educational Evaluation). I would request one in a separate email from the one I reference above. If you are unfamiliar with and/or need more information about IEEs, reply back.

I had trouble finding 300.347(a)(7), as well. But Section 1414 Part B (d) of the IDEA is alive and well and has similar language. It does not specifically state "at least as often as parents are informed of their nondisabled children's progress," but leaves it to the team to describe in the IEP document when reports on progress will be provided and gives the example of concurring with the issuance of report cards. Since the IEP states the first one will be provided in June, the school is in compliance. Here is my advice from a practical (not legal) standpoint. Depending on what date in February the IEP was implemented, there may not be a lot of data to provide. Often progress monitoring reports that cover only a portion of a quarter say something to the effect of "IEP just implemented on such and such a date, no data available." However, depending on the disability and goals, there very well could be some data available for the month of March (and maybe some in February depending on implementation date). Even though the IEP states the first progress monitoring will be provided in June, nothing keeps you from reaching out to the case manager and asking for some data points now (say something like you don't want to wait until school is out to see if progress is being made, even though you do understand that it hasn't been implemented for that long). Don't throw any law at them just yet. See if they will respond to a friendly email first. If they refuse, you could ask for an amendment to the IEP that progress monitoring will be provided concurrent with grade cards starting with the end of third quarter of school year 2024-2025. They could make this amendment without or with a meeting. But if they were unwilling to voluntarily provide some data points (your first step), it is unlikely the team will agree to amend the IEP, in which case you're probably stuck. I don't know what the disability or goals are, but in general, I would say this isn't a battle to take on. You will likely have other more important battles to fight in the future. But it doesn't hurt and isn't unreasonable to ask for some informal data now.

Can you just reach out and ask the team or IEP coordinator (or whoever sent the Notice of Meeting) what a Due Process Specialist is and what the role of this person will be at this meeting? Seems like a valid question.

What is the eligibility category in the IEP (or categories)? You mention both a diagnosis of a speech and language disorder and a reading disability. Although there could be some overlap of the types of services used for each, I think it's important to distinguish between the two. If his reading struggles are the result of his severe phonological speech and language disorder and not a specific learning disability (reading disability), the approach could be different and the teacher would need different training and skill sets for each. I don't know all the facts, but it appears that he might need additional minutes with a speech language pathologist rather than a reading specialist to address his specific disorder. I would suggest requesting an IEE (Independent Educational Evaluation) from the school, which would be at no cost to you. An outside provider would probably be able to delve into the complexity of these issues better than the school district and would provide recommendations for both treatment/services and accommodations. You are entitled to request an IEE when disagree with or feel the school evaluation is not sufficient. The school district must agree to this or else take you to a due process hearing to prove an IEE is not necessary. This is very inconvenient for school districts, so they usually just agree to the IEE. And you're definitely on to something in wanting to request pull-out services. If he is not making significant progress according to the progress monitoring reports, something needs to change.

Text me and we'll schedule something offline.

What areas of disability are missing from the above testing? You'll need to point that out specifically.

What areas were checked on the Consent to Evaluate form? Yes, absent agreement between parent and school district to not evaluate, all areas (not necessarily the same tests) for which the student is still receiving services should be re-evaluated. If they were not and if you want them to be, reach out and ask that they be done. Yes, there should be a meeting to go over the results of the re-evaluation. It would be in addition to the annual review, but the annual review could be done immediately following the meeting to review evaluation results.

There is a lot going on here and hard to advise without more info. Could you possibly call me at 816-547-5467? I am an advocate that works in Missouri and Kansas and sometimes other states. This would be outside of A Day in Our Shoes. It would be me as an advocate giving you my free one hour consultation.

Yes, it is absolutely time to change the curriculum they are using. What is the disability and what program are they using currently? If dyslexia, it must be evidence-based, multi-sensory, structured literacy. But not all programs, even if they meet these requirement, work for all kids. Sounds like it's time to try something new.

Were you involved in the "IEP team" decision to move his intervention? You should have been. Where was the intervention happening previously? What was the reason for the change - to try to get more than "minimal growth?" Or did it have something to do with the school's staffing or scheduling? If the progress monitoring data shows growth up until the change in placement and decline after that for an entire quarter, this should be enough data. Did you make the request in an email? Maybe you need to request an IEP meeting so you can ask them point blank: How can you say there isn't a problem when YOUR data is showing a decline since the change in placement? How long does he have to show decline before it's considered a problem? If they still refuse, ask for a Prior Written Notice to be sent to you after the meeting specifying the denied request and reasons for the denial. Other steps you could consider are getting an advocate and sending an email to the special education director with your concerns. And make sure from now on that you receive progress monitoring on a quarterly basis (I assume that is in the IEP). Also, keep in mind that the growth he makes should be more than his peers in order to close the gap (i.e., if he only makes a year's worth of progress in a year, as his peers are as well, he will never close the gap). If he isn't making sufficient growth, the IEP isn't working and needs to be revised.