Leaderboard

Others may disagree, but my feeling is that if something is no longer a parent concern, it can be removed. If it comes up again, it can always be added back in. The prior IEP's are your proof of informing the school of the parent concerns for that IEP year.

This is a tough one. I'm sure Lisa will chime in with some great suggestions. Here's what I'm thinking. In general, a parent cannot dictate who the staff member is - but can dictate that they be trained to provide the necessary services and accommodations to the child. So that would be one question to look into: What is the training of the person(s) the school is considering for his 1:1? If not sufficient (you'll need a report that sets out what your son needs), make that argument (which might lead to them hiring someone else). You could also ask that during the transition period (and this is a huge transition) that your son's current care attendant be allowed to be the aid in tandem with whoever will be fulling this role at the school. It might make the transition easier and you have the letter that this is recommended. You would, of course, have to pay/have Medicaid pay for the current care attendant's time to help with the transition. I don't know much about how Medicaid factors into this. Does this funding stop when a child reaches Kindergarten? Or would it be possible to continue with the same care attendant and just obtain the school's approval that this person be the 1:1? (Can't see why they would object to this - would help them out tremendously - but there could be liability issues, union issues, etc.) This is not my area of expertise so just speaking generally. Hopefully others with more experience will join the discussion.

Ugh, what a mess—and I’m so sorry you’re dealing with this. The short answer? No, they should not be threatening to move your son back to his old school because of absences related to his disability. Here’s why: This is a disability-related attendance issue Your son has ADHD and severe anxiety, both of which are documented disabilities. The absences are excused and tied to medical and therapeutic needs, which means this isn’t just a truancy issue—it’s a disability access issue. Placement decisions must be based on the IEP—not attendance numbers IDEA requires that placement decisions (which include which school he attends) be made by the IEP team and based on the least restrictive environment for that student—not on whether a principal or teacher is frustrated with absences. They cannot unilaterally change his placement because it’s more convenient or “easier for them.” This could be disability discrimination under Section 504 If the school is penalizing your child because of disability-related absences, that can be seen as discrimination. Especially if the absences are backed by doctor’s notes and tied to therapy or health care. You need to put this in writing—now Send a formal letter/email to the school (cc the principal, IEP case manager, and district special ed director) stating: The absences are due to documented disabilities and supported by medical notes You are requesting that the IEP be reviewed and amended to include accommodations for medical-related absences You want written confirmation that they are not moving him without an IEP team meeting and without your consent And make it crystal clear: if they attempt to move him based on absences, you’ll consider it a procedural violation and possible 504/ADA discrimination. Also—document the teacher’s complaints if you haven’t already. That kind of pressure can sometimes lead to retaliation, and it’s better to have a paper trail. You’re doing exactly what you should: standing up and asking questions. Now it’s time to put it in writing and hold the district accountable. You’ve got this.

I had trouble finding 300.347(a)(7), as well. But Section 1414 Part B (d) of the IDEA is alive and well and has similar language. It does not specifically state "at least as often as parents are informed of their nondisabled children's progress," but leaves it to the team to describe in the IEP document when reports on progress will be provided and gives the example of concurring with the issuance of report cards. Since the IEP states the first one will be provided in June, the school is in compliance. Here is my advice from a practical (not legal) standpoint. Depending on what date in February the IEP was implemented, there may not be a lot of data to provide. Often progress monitoring reports that cover only a portion of a quarter say something to the effect of "IEP just implemented on such and such a date, no data available." However, depending on the disability and goals, there very well could be some data available for the month of March (and maybe some in February depending on implementation date). Even though the IEP states the first progress monitoring will be provided in June, nothing keeps you from reaching out to the case manager and asking for some data points now (say something like you don't want to wait until school is out to see if progress is being made, even though you do understand that it hasn't been implemented for that long). Don't throw any law at them just yet. See if they will respond to a friendly email first. If they refuse, you could ask for an amendment to the IEP that progress monitoring will be provided concurrent with grade cards starting with the end of third quarter of school year 2024-2025. They could make this amendment without or with a meeting. But if they were unwilling to voluntarily provide some data points (your first step), it is unlikely the team will agree to amend the IEP, in which case you're probably stuck. I don't know what the disability or goals are, but in general, I would say this isn't a battle to take on. You will likely have other more important battles to fight in the future. But it doesn't hurt and isn't unreasonable to ask for some informal data now.

putting your daughter in a position to defend her own accommodations? Absolutely unacceptable. I totally get wanting to educate this teacher instead of just blasting them with anger (which, let’s be honest, at times they kinda deserve). Here are a few short but impactful resources you can send: 1. The Classic: “F.A.T. City” Workshop (Frustration, Anxiety, Tension) Video Richard Lavoie’s “How Hard Can This Be?” This is an eye-opening workshop where a specialist makes neurotypical teachers feel what it’s like to have a learning disability. Every teacher should be required to watch this. 2. Harvard Article: Why Neurodivergent Kids Work 2x as Hard Article The Twice-Exceptional Dilemma This explains how 2e students work harder than neurotypical peers and why accommodations are essential—not a “crutch.” 3. One-Liner Response for the Future For your daughter: "My IEP is set up so I can access learning, not just so I can get good grades." For the teacher: "Accommodations don’t make learning easier—they make it possible." Would love to hear how this goes. Hopefully, the teacher has enough self-awareness to take the hint.

RePosted • @casponline, Governor Newsom signed into law the CASP-supported measure, AB 2173 (Addis). This new law allows the term ‘emotional disability’ as an acceptable alternative to the existing ‘emotional disturbance’ label in California’s Education Code and regulations. CASP believes that this change in terminology will help to reduce the stigma associated with mental health challenges which can be a major barrier to individuals seeking help and support. A big thank you to the legislature, Assembly Member Addis, Governor Newsom, and the CASP Legislative Committee for their unwavering support and coordination in getting this bill passed. This is a significant step forward for our community!

A child should always get all intervention they require to make them successful regardless of the eligibility category. If the primary disability is SLD, they should still receive goals, services, and/or accommodations for anxiety if the evaluations show they are needed to access the general education curriculum. If the primary disability is OHI, they should still receive goals, services, and/or accommodations for SLD if the evaluations show they are needed to access the general education curriculum. Your child's life should not be ruined either way because they school district is required to provide needed interventions in all areas of need. Having said that, I feel the primary disability is important, because that tends to be how the teachers view the child. Do you want the teachers to think your child's anxiety is the bigger problem or the reading comprehension. Also, what do you as a parent feel is affecting your child the most - the anxiety or the reading comprehension? But it will also depend on what the evaluations say, and it sounds like the school district may argue that the data points to OHI -but make them PROVE that if you disagree. I'm also very suspect when school districts want to avoid the SLD classification. They may feel that this holds them to a higher standard, such as providing evidence-based multisensory structured instruction, even though my thought is this is required even if SLD is a secondary category. There also might be state laws that kick in regarding SLD's that they're trying to avoid. Go with your gut - you know you child the best. But also be prepared to back up your decision by referencing data in the evaluations and (if you think it will be helpful) asking the general education teacher what s/he feels is your child's bigger obstacle.

You can get a BIP without an FBA, but it's not best practice. More here: https://adayinourshoes.com/behavior-iep-special-education/ And, more here (sorry I'm on my way out the door): https://adayinourshoes.com/one-on-one-aide-paraprofessional-iep-special-education/

First—great job pushing to get this clarified in the IEP. Vague accommodations are basically useless when every teacher gets to “interpret” them differently. A few tips to consider: Define It in Plain Language Example: “Student will receive two additional school days, not calendar days, beyond the original due date for all assignments, unless otherwise mutually agreed upon in writing.” Add Clarification for When Teachers Are Absent Example: “If the teacher is absent on the original or extended due date, the due date will automatically extend by the number of days the teacher is unavailable.” Include a Communication Expectation Example: “Teachers will communicate any adjusted due dates in writing (email or learning management system) so the student and parent have clear documentation.” Specify for Tests and Quizzes Example: “Student will receive time and a half for all in-class tests and quizzes, consistent with College Board-approved accommodations.” Request Staff Training or Clarification Ask that teachers be given written instructions from the case manager or IEP team about how this is supposed to work across all classes. You’re definitely on the right track. Tightening up the language now will save you a ton of headaches later.

Whew—this is such a powerful, clear, and unfortunately very common story for 2e (twice exceptional) kids in public school. First, you’re doing everything right—you’ve documented, provided outside data, shown samples, advocated consistently, and kept the focus on your child’s actual experience—not just the grades or scores. Here’s the heart of the issue: your son is masking his disabilities with his strengths, and the school is choosing to see only the strengths. That’s not just frustrating—it’s a systemic failure for so many 2e kids. You're right that "relative to ability" isn't part of the eligibility criteria under IDEA anymore, and that makes it harder to qualify under SLD if a student is still performing at or above grade level. But nothing in the law says schools can't consider the discrepancy between a student’s ability and their actual performance—or how hard they’re working to maintain those grades. That’s a red flag the team is ignoring. Here are some suggestions and next steps: 1. Ask for an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) at public expense. If the school’s reevaluation was surface-level or didn't fully assess his functional performance, especially in reading and writing under stress or timed conditions, this is your next move. You have the right to request it if you disagree with their evaluation. Read up before you do this (info on my site) because if the school declines, they're required to file for due process. 2. Ask for data on how the writing accommodations are being implemented. Teacher conferencing sounds nice, but without documentation, it's fluff. Ask: How often is it happening? What is being taught or corrected? How is progress tracked? I have a mini course on IEP progress monitoring. 3. Push for goals and services in written expression. You have the samples. You have the documentation. He’s not meeting grade-level expectations independently. Use that language. Ask for a meeting to specifically address writing fluency, spelling, and on-demand writing without supports. 4. Bring in the emotional impact. Stress, shutdown, refusal—these are all signs that he's not accessing the curriculum in a meaningful, functional way. Emotional distress is educational impact under IDEA. 5. Reframe the “good grades” argument. Say: “Good grades with heavy scaffolding are not the same as skill mastery. He is not progressing independently or sustainably. That’s not FAPE.” 6. Consider requesting an FBA. If he's overwhelmed, shutting down, or showing behavior at home tied to school stress, an FBA for emotional regulation in response to school demands might help. It also gives you a documented path toward support if burnout increases. 7. Lean into transition goals as you head toward high school. That self-advocacy skill you mentioned? That should be in the IEP. You can ask for direct instruction in self-advocacy and executive functioning as he prepares for the next stage. I know it’s exhausting—and it’s not fair that your son’s strengths are being used against him. But the fact that he wants to be in school, wants to do well, and is finally starting to speak up for himself? That’s a huge win. You’re not overreacting. You’re seeing the iceberg the school is trying to ignore—and trying to steer your son safely past it. I have sample language for these requests, letter templates, in the IEP toolkit which is being revised right now. You're doing an incredible job.

YES—what you’re describing absolutely could warrant an IEP. You're not just being protective or overly cautious—you're seeing real, documented barriers to access, despite the school handing out “good grades” like they prove everything is fine. (Spoiler: they don’t.) “Effective Progress” ≠ “Good Grades” Schools love to lean on grades to show a student is “doing fine.” But under IDEA, “effective progress” means progress appropriate for the student, considering their unique needs—not just whether they’re pulling an A on a worksheet with 80% of it reduced or dictated to someone else. You said it yourself: "How can a 6th grader who doesn’t write their own essay or have the work reduced 80% be making effective progress?" Exactly. He’s accessing the curriculum through intense modification and scaffolding—which is fine! But that’s the definition of needing specially designed instruction (aka, an IEP). Dictation ≠ Writing Instruction Adding dictation as a 504 accommodation isn’t a fix—it’s a band-aid. Yes, it helps with access, but it doesn’t address the underlying skill deficit in written expression. Kids with dysgraphia and executive functioning issues like ADHD often need explicit, specialized instruction in: Organizing ideas Developing paragraphs Mechanics and syntax Planning, drafting, and revising That's instructional support, not just an access tool. And that’s where pull-out or push-in ELA support through an IEP comes in. When a student is writing “I am stupid” on tests, shutting down during writing tasks, and visibly distressed during classwork, that’s not just a mental health issue, it’s a symptom of a mismatch between what he’s being asked to do and what his current supports can actually address. Yes, he has access to the adjustment counselor through his 504, but that doesn’t resolve the instructional mismatch and the writing-based performance anxiety. These need to be addressed together, not siloed off. What to Bring to the Meeting Data + Documentation Bring copies of the assignments that were reduced, the math test with the “I’m stupid” note, and any communications showing how much support he’s needing just to get through assignments. Highlight Skill Deficits, Not Grades Say: “We’re not seeing independent skills. We’re seeing workarounds. That’s not the same as progress.” Use IDEA Language “My child requires specially designed instruction in written expression to make meaningful progress in the general education curriculum. Accommodations alone are no longer sufficient.” Ask for SDI Goals Even if they push for just a 504 revision, ask: “What’s the school’s plan for directly teaching writing? How will that be tracked and measured? Bottom line: this is exactly the kind of situation IDEA was written for. A child who’s smart, but struggling because they’re being patched through instead of taught in the way they need. You're absolutely right to push for an IEP, and you’ve already laid the groundwork beautifully with your eval requests.

I do have some feed back from the school though it is not as plain as it can be. The proposed 504 accommodation change from written testing to oral testing is for regular class room work. The school went on to explain how the oral testing works. But the response did not answer our question of why the change. We will not send another email for clarity. There is a meeting scheduled this month and we will address it then. We have signed a consent for a Full Individual Evaluation and they said that it will be a psychological evaluation to determine if she has an Emotional Disability. If it is positive for Emotional Disability, then they can proceed with a FBA , then develop a BIP to be apart of 504 or IEP.

You’re already walking into that meeting with a solid plan. Honestly? Great job on how you’ve framed this—especially your focus on FAPE, Child Find, and using legal precedent. You’re doing exactly what a good advocate should: connecting the dots between the emotional impact, the lack of access, and the school’s legal obligations. Here are a few ideas you might add to your strategy—some are small tweaks, some are additional leverage: 6. School-Based Counseling IS a Related Service under IDEA If the school is denying counseling with a flippant “she doesn’t need it,” ask: Where is that determination documented in the IEP or any evaluation? If it’s not in the IEP or based on an evaluation, that’s a procedural violation. Under IDEA, counseling is a related service that must be provided if it’s needed for the student to benefit from special education. Suggested language: “Given the documented emotional impact of her learning challenges and current refusal to attend school, counseling should be added to the IEP as a related service. This is consistent with 34 CFR § 300.34.” 7. Demand Data (Or Highlight the Lack of It) Has the team provided any progress monitoring or data on emotional or behavioral functioning? If not, ask: “How is the team determining that current supports are appropriate when there is no consistent data being gathered on emotional regulation, anxiety, or attendance?” Bonus: If attendance data shows a pattern, use it to demonstrate lack of access to instruction, a cornerstone of FAPE. 8. Assistive Technology (AT) Consideration If she’s refusing to attend due to anxiety, but still shows academic potential, request an AT assessment for remote access to instruction while the team works on placement. No, it's not a long-term solution—but it's a bridge that shows you're trying to keep her engaged while they get their act together. 9. Refer to OCR and State Guidance You might also drop this little reminder: The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has repeatedly stated that anxiety and school avoidance are not “voluntary” behaviors, and districts must address the emotional health of students under both IDEA and Section 504. 10. And Finally—Document Parent Requests for Comp Ed If she’s missed substantial instructional time due to the district’s delay in addressing her emotional needs, mention that the parent reserves the right to request compensatory education. No need to demand it yet—but drop it as a breadcrumb. You're already 10 steps ahead of where most teams expect you to be. Add a little more heat to that sauce with these points, and you’ll make it very clear: this isn’t just a “kid with test anxiety”—this is a denial of FAPE, a Child Find fail, and a procedural mess waiting to become a legal problem for them.

If they want a health plan, why did they say they want the child to have a follow-up with a neurologist? The doctor isn't going to write a plan - they are going to give them clearance to attend school (just like the ER docs did). If the school wants a health plan, they need to say that. Things need to be in writing so everyone is on the same page with understanding what's needed for the medical suspension to end. Common sense says that the prescribing doctor is who should come up with a plan if this is due to a side effect of a med. (My feeling is schools are short on common sense in some situations. I've seen this with my own child.)

In this situation, I'd write to the case manager/special ed teacher: Hi- I was looking at the IEP and it says the 1st progress report won't be done until June. I feel it's too long to go without knowing how the IEP is helping. Is it possible to get an update on progress in early April so we can see if the IEP is helping or if it might need to be tweaked? I'm concerned with getting this in June and then school is out for summer and not being able to meet to tweak the IEP until several weeks into the next school year. A parent/teacher conference to look at progress in early April would also be a substitute for this where I can discuss XX's progress with you. Please let me know which works better for you.

Totally agree. But, not to give school districts any slack, it is more difficult these days to determine "preferential seating," because the teachers tend to more around the room, teach from different locations/white boards, etc. As Lisa states above, you have to look at the individual student and what his/her needs are and then precisely define "preferential seating." You also have to ask if the onus is on the child to determine the best seating or the teacher. This depends on the child's age, awareness of their issues, and ability to self-advocate.

Also request the IEE at the same time you send written communication about the missed eval. The school had its chance.

I think the parent training on some time-keeping skills is the best way to go. It sounds like the team is doing the other pre-reminders and reminders already.

First, let me preface that this is not legal advise, as we do not give legal advise on this site. The IDEA does not say anything specific about being late to meetings (to my knowledge), but it does speak to parents not making themselves available for or replying to attempts to schedule meetings. At some point the school has to move on and just make sure all attempts to schedule the meeting have been sufficient and documented. I would say being significantly late to meetings would fall under this provision. However, the ADA might apply here requiring accommodations for dad's disability. But it sounds like you are doing everything you can. Can you talk to the dad about this issue? Ask him what the best way to get him there on time would be? Ask if he has someone who can assist him? If he is not working, he might be getting assistance from a government agency - not just financial, but also daily living. Could they help? Do they make sure he gets to doctors' or other appointments on time? Who is making sure the student gets to appointments on time, because it sounds like he wouldn't be able to. Can that person/aide help? I personally think booking longer timeslots would be an unnecessary burden on the school.

Data collection is generally done as part of an evaluation. On average, evals take 60 days - depends on state regs. With the written evaluation in hand, the team meets and decides on support for the student (or not if they don't meet criteria to get help). Special ed level data collection would require parent permission. Is the data collection & intervention trials part of RTI/MTSS where there are no timelines for placing support in place? RTI & MTSS are part of general ed intervention where data collection & support trials would not need parent permission. If I was the parent, I'd be asking for a copy of the observation results report as well as requesting a team meeting to see what the next step can be. The school should have a 'child study team' of some sort that works with gen ed students who need RTI or MTSS. If this is a special ed eval, they missed the timeline for completing the eval & moving forward and a state complain can be filed. Given how you have described this student, they need a special ed level of evaluation for learning disabilities. Having a LD & not getting the support you need can lead to frustration that comes out as punching classmates. The 'in your face' thing is the punching where this ends up being the school's focus and the root of the issue (the LD) isn't looked at. In cases like this, supporting the LD can fix the behavior. (Documentary, The Kids We Lose, covered this issue.)

You are absolutely correct that any areas in which the child was found eligible and has an IEP for has a right to have a re-evaluation in those areas every three years. I would suggest referring the school psychologist to the IDEA and any state guidelines you can find regarding special education processes that address this specific issue. l would even call your state department of education and speak with someone and add THAT to you email. I would also copy your director of special education. The only allowed reason for not conducting a three year re-eval is if BOTH the school district and parent agree. I they still say "no," ask for a PWN and file a state complaint. As far as the math goals, again, you are absolutely correct that she should be switched to life skills math. At a minimum, she should not be attending any gen ed math classes at all, but instead should be spending that time in special education math. Schools try to argue that students need to stay at least part of the time in the gen ed math class so they are exposed to the skills their peers are learning. But your daughter is way too far behind to get anything our of a gen ed math class and it would be very frustrating and a complete waste of time. Other than pointing to her significantly low math level, I'm not sure how else to convince the team.

You really can't put a "cap" on the number of accommodations needed because it totally depends on the child's needs - you could have a child with multiple disabilities who needs multiple accommodations. You base the number on what is needed - not on whether or not it is difficult to implement. However, you make a very good point about a teacher's ability to implement multiple accommodations (25 is quite a large number). Without knowing all the facts it's difficult to say whether a collaborative classroom is best. I would start by pointing out the impossibility of a teacher to stay on top of all these accommodations and ask for push in minutes from a special education teacher or an aide for the classroom - both of which can assist with the accommodations. If that doesn't work, then a more restrictive environment might be an appropriate discussion.

How many accommodations are reasonable for in IEP? An IEP was just written for a student with 25 accommodations. Is a collaborative classroom the best fit for this student, and how can a teacher stay in compliance /document that number of accommodations?

I'm guessing you've used all of them, but here are the "arguments" you could use with the custodial parent: 1) Ask why (what data) she has that the general ed material is "too hard?" Has the child verbalized this? Are grades falling? Does she struggle doing homework with her? 2) Explain that is wouldn't be fair to the younger child to stay on the same track as the older child if the younger child is more capable - could lead to resentment later on. 3) Is the grandmother able and willing to engaged the younger child in social activities that help with the socialization of home-schooled children? Or will social skills and interaction suffer? 4) Would she be willing to try the gen ed setting for a while with supports to see how the child does before pulling him/her to home-schooling? Gather more data? Speak with the child after each school day for indications of struggles? Check in with the gen ed teacher? I don't know much about home-schooling, but I would guess if the grandmother uses a state-approved program there would be no educational neglect.

I think the first thing is to make sure the student will cooperate with an IEP if he is given one. If he "doesn't want any help at school," does this mean he doesn't want to be pulled from the general education setting and go to special education? If he can't be talked into this, I'm not sure it's worth the fight to get an evaluation. When you say "the support" is not helpful, do you mean specialized instruction that students receive via an IEP for dyslexia or accommodations via a 504 Plan? Could the parent consider private tutoring? A student is usually given a brief evaluation before the tutoring begins with no obligation to sign up for tutoring. As far as the timeline for requesting another evaluation if denied, she should request an IEE, file a state complaint, and/or file for due process based on the fact that the school was presented with a diagnosis of dyslexia (and other data showing struggles) and refused to evaluate.

It's hard to answer your questions (at least for me, anyway) without some clarification. 1. Does the student have an IEP? Just confirming because sometimes a BIP can be in place without an IEP. 2. How does the BIP define "emergency removal?" Is it an action, a place, or both? 3. How/when is the location of sitting outside of gen ed classroom triggered? 4. When the listed behavior occurs, what is the process that is stated in the BIP in terms of where the student goes, what processing is done with the student, how it is determined when student will return to class? Is sitting outside the gen ed classroom a step in the process to return to class? 4. When the student is sent to the "Alternate Learning Placement," is this where students are sent for in-school suspensions? (That might be what they are talking about when they mention the 10 days because a removal for behavior in violation of school policy would not trigger a PWN or be considered a denial of FAPE until it reaches 10 days. But multiple occurrences (even if less than 10 days) should be a reason to revisit the BIP and see what can be revised to address the behavior.

We have decided to go forward with the 504 (covering PT and OT) and 2 RTI plans (one for speech and one for social skills). We will continue to reassess frequently throughout the year and make sure she is getting the support she needs. We are trying to balance keeping her in the environment she is in vs having to change her environment. I have really appreciated everyone support! If anyone has any other questions or advice or things for us to consider please know I will continue to check this!

CSE seems to be a NY thing. I (and Google) didn't see this associated with any other state. I'm not familiar with what the position entails. To answer your question. If I was looking to evaluate a student and knowing that IDEA is looking for students to be assessed in all areas of suspected disability, I'd look at the school records & put on my detective hat. If I saw low math grades, I'd suspect a math disability. If I saw many referrals for behavior, I'd suspect a behavior disability. This would be the guide to use for whomever was coming up with the disabilities I'd suspect in a student and the direction for a triennial evaluation to head in. I'm not sure if this is normal or not but it is not a conflict of interest to review records in order to plan what's needed to go forward. Also, in very small school districts you'll find that one admin will wear many hats.

I have never encountered a Committee for Special Education (I assume that's what CSE stands for?). But I don't see how there is a conflict of interest problem. When doing the evaluation, she must abide by the standards of her school phycologist role. Are you thinking the committee will have ulterior motives in terms of placement or other things that would create a conflict of interest? Unfortunately, I don't think you can assume that right off the bat and will have wait until you have some type of proof that her dual role is biasing her evaluation.

This is a copy & paste of the law from this website: https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/title33/t33ch2/sect33-202/ TITLE 33 EDUCATION CHAPTER 2 ATTENDANCE AT SCHOOLS 33-202. School attendance compulsory. The parent or guardian of any child resident in this state who has attained the age of seven (7) years at the time of the commencement of school in his district, but not the age of sixteen (16) years, shall cause the child to be instructed in subjects commonly and usually taught in the public schools of the state of Idaho. To accomplish this, a parent or guardian shall either cause the child to be privately instructed by, or at the direction of, his parent or guardian; or enrolled in a public school or public charter school, including an on-line or virtual charter school or private or parochial school during a period in each year equal to that in which the public schools are in session; there to conform to the attendance policies and regulations established by the board of trustees, or other governing body, operating the school attended. History: [33-202, added 1963, ch. 13, sec. 25, p. 27; am. 1992, ch. 243, sec. 1, p. 721; am. 2009, ch. 103, sec. 2, p. 318.] I am not a lawyer but the way I'm interpreting this is if you are 7 on the day school starts, you must be enrolled in school. If he's turning 7 in a month, school has already 'commenced', so he'll need to start in the fall. I don't see this as a truancy issue. Part of school evaluations often include a classroom observation. I think this will be needed before the school says a 1:1 is needed. Parent will not see this on an IEP or 504 until the child is in school & the school sees a need. Has the family considered a virtual charter school where they can provide 1:1 support? This might be a way to show the local school district that a 1:1 aide is needed.

I don't think not having an IEP in place when the school is doing all it can is ever a reason to not attend school. Of course, I don't know all the facts. What is it the parents want in place before their child goes to school? Is there a fear of elopement or some other safety issue? If so, that would be a valid reason, but have they asked the school to put something in place informally until the IEP can be put in place? Would a 504 (that process is usually faster) work until the IEP could be put in place? If there is a valid reason, have the parents asked for ways to instruct the child at home until they feel comfortable enough to send him/her?

Yes. Like Carolyn said: Requesting an IEE at school expense is the next step when the eval is inaccurate or incomplete. (Was the testing done in June when your child was in 7th?) Comparisons should be to a typical peer and not a student with an IEP. https://adayinourshoes.com/iee-independent-education-evaluation/

You ask for an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) for the reasons set forth in this post. This would be at no cost to you, and school district either has to agreed to one or take you to due process to show why they shouldn't provide an IEE (so 99% of the time the request is granted).

I think you need to ask to see the progress reports for prior years as well as the SDI that has been provided to the student. It sounds like the remedial intervention through the IEP they have had for 8 years hasn't been helping. When was the student identified as needing help with reading? What level were they at back then? How much progress have they made? Do they have an intellectual disability that prevents them from being receptive to the special instruction in reading that has been provided? What has the school been doing? What are the teacher's certifications and/or qualifications to provide remedial reading services? It's great that they are changing the SDI in the IEP given that is sounds like they have not responded well to prior intervention. I would ask to see the evidence/research on this push-in protocol and how it will do a better job with closing the gap between this child's present levels and where classmates are. Given how far behind they are, the school needs to be doing something different/better to catch this student up. With the bullying that goes on in the MS grades, I would hesitate to do push-in IEP services. It could cause this student to become a target where they will start having mental health issues from the bullying in addition to the SLD. In your shoes, I would also look at how the school is accommodating the student's deficit areas with things like talk to text software and audiobooks. If these are not in place, they will not have access to general education material. My gut says that a child who is 6 years behind needs to be placed in a private special education school at public expense because it seems like the school has tried and failed this student. They need to start making 2 years of progress in reading each year so they can be caught up by the time they graduate. Given what the school wants to do, my feeling is that this student will drop out and never graduate. They will not be able to hold very many jobs with reading at this low a level given how important reading is. Would they even be able to fill out a job application if they don't start making better progress?

I would write a parent letter of concern. Dear School- What I see at home is my child, XX, will get overstimulated where behaviors get bad when she's allowed to use electronics. I'm not sure that allowing her to use her Chromebook during 'brain breaks' at school does the same thing. I do feel that allowing her to use her Chromebook at school for " non essential academic tasks", as stated in her IEP, does not follow her IEP. I would rather see her looking at a book, playing cards, playing with a fidget, punching a punching bag or other heavy physical activities rather than allowing her to use electronics would work better to reset her ability to stay on task when she returns to the classroom after taking a break. Can we try these activities and see if they work better than having her on her Chromebook? Thanks,

I don't see why not, and it certainly wouldn't hurt to ask the 504 team if this could be added as an accommodation. However, I don't know if the school will agree. When you say he was "tested," was he tested for academic achievement or just behavior? You might reach out and ask for additional testing - something else might be going on such as dyscalculia. Also, depending on how low his scores are in math, he might qualify for an IEP, which would give him specialized instruction in math - hopefully in a manner that works for him.

If this school district has a rule that a student needs to be on a 504 for a year before they will do a special ed eval: 1- Get this in writing. 2- File a complaint with the state using 1 as evidence. 3- Ask who the school's 504 coordinator is and request a 504 meeting so a 504 can be drafted and put in place. 4- Request that the prior school send a copy of the 504 the child had when the IEP went away. See if they can tell her the date it started. (It might exist - parents are not required members of the 504 team. And if it's been in place for a year it might be time for an IEP.)

My answer is going with the assumption that you voluntarily placed your child in the private school and it was not an out-of-district placement agreed upon by an IEP team in your home district. If that is not the case, please reach out again because my answer would likely be different. There may also be a difference if your child was found eligible prior to or after placement in the private school. When a child is enrolled in a private school, it is the responsibility of the district in which the private school is located to conduct evaluations, determining eligibility, and developing a plan for special education services. Also, it will most likely not be called an IEP, but rather a "services plan." You do not have the same rights to special education in a private school setting that you have in a public school. Funds are allocated to public school districts for providing special education services in private schools in their district, but they have a lot of flexibility in how they spend those funds. Any meeting you have with the school district to develop the plan should include a representative from the private school. I would suggest reaching out to your state department of education for specific guidelines in your state.

We are going to need more facts for this. What do you mean by "full support" versus "itinerary or supplementary support?" I can respond in a general sense... You need data to show the student needs the support you're asking for. What do you mean by "records" show serious struggle? Has there been a school evaluation? That is what you need to refer to in order to show a need. Point to struggles/deficiencies shown by the school evaluation and other data (grades, teacher comments, etc.) and make sure it is documented in the present levels. If it's there, it needs to be addressed with accommodations. Ask the team: "Why aren't you providing the support that the present levels show the student needs?" If the school evaluation/present levels don't show a need, you can disagree with the school evaluation and request an IEE (Independent Educational Evaluation) at school expense. Unfortunately, school districts do not have to follow the recommendations in an IEE, but they do need to consider them.

Question: What's the most creative or unusual accommodation you've successfully included in your child's IEP? How has it helped them?

I think there was one IEP meeting where the school saw our perspective. My child was in a job exploration program and many of the community partners are retail stores and food service. When you have a child whose transition goal is college and a job in an office, these types of jobs don't align too well with that goal. I think that clicked at this meeting. We were offered a job shadow opportunity in the school's IT department. This was pivotal in my child's life. Prior to this, they wanted to go into graphic design. This position changed their focus and they went to school/got a degree in IT. Funny story. One assignment was to transfer videos on a disk, label them and store them for future use. They couldn't get it to work. My child figured out that the accessory holding the disk needed to be turned on where the people training them couldn't figure this out.

That's one thing that can shock parents but the school follows their evals and considers an outside eval. Outside experts in person at a meeting - same thing. They will follow what their staff says. Did they say no to an IEE at school expense? Tell them your child is bored and it going to be a behavior issue if his slow processing and ADHD aren't taken into account. The 1st rule of special ed is to do it in writing (email is OK) so you have a paper trail. I feel a 504 to accommodate the disabilities the outside eval found is a good 1st step. You can't force them to give your child an IEP & put them in the grade you want him in. An attorney & due process is the way to get them to do things.

IMO, he needs to sign over educational guardianship to you. I do know he'll need to be 18 & an adult to sign this sort of paperwork. (You can't do it ahead of time but you can have the paperwork ready for his signature on his birthday.) A FERPA waiver might also be expected by the school. Many special ed attorneys offer a free 15 minute consult but they will likely want to set up the paperwork for this if you contact them. (I'm in PA & the age of majority for IEPs seems to be 21 here so I didn't have to deal with this.) Not sure if you can find a free template for this online. How do you know this will be his last year? He can stay in school until 21. What are his post HS graduation plans? Will he need a current evaluation to get accommodations where he plans to be post-graduation? If yes, ask the school to do an eval during the 2024-25 school year so you don't need to pay for one. Also, every child should be providing their parent with POA when they turn 18. Disability/incapacitation can happen in an instant. I remember a lawyer with 2 children had a POA set up for his disabled adult child. It was his typical adult child who ended up hospitalized from a skiing accident & he couldn't get any info from the hospital.

I would request a meeting and make sure the principal and director were there. Ask for the 2:1 to be put in the services section or at a minimum the TA. I would also request a new or revised PWN setting forth that the 2:1 agreed to at the meeting was removed without another meeting being held and the reasons why it was removed.

Hello. Compensatory services are very complicated, but I will attempt to answer each of your questions below: 1. Although you should check with your state department of education, generally, compensatory services do not have to be provided on a 1:1 basis. It depends on how much progress (or lack of progress) the child made after being denied the required services. To determine this, you may need to request an IEE to show that the child could have made more progress had the required services been given. The goal is to get the child to the point they would have been had the services been provided, but this does not necessarily mean that make-up services have to be 1:1. 2. ESY and compensatory services are two distinct services based on two distinct determinations and cannot be provided concurrently. 3. Who can be a "Reading Specialist" is likely defined by requirements set forth by your state department of education. A general education teacher may very well meet the definition depending on his/her training in early intervention reading, etc., or whatever the state requires. But if the IEP states "Reading Specialist," it has to be someone that meets this definition. I do not think a PWN would be appropriate to deny something already written into an IEP. An amendment would be the correct route, but I would fight that. 4. If they are not using Wilson and that is written into the IEP, they are in violation. I'm surprised they stated a specific methodology if they can't/won't use it. The problem you might encounter, however, if you tried to enforce this by way of a state complaint or due process is that the state or hearing officer would be sympathetic to the school district if they could show the methodology they are using is comparable to Wilson. Again, they should amend the IEP if they are not going to follow it. A PWN does not give a school district a pass on implementing what's already written into an IEP.

Did the school psychologist provide a reason on why they want this category? I'm in PA & what I've found is they have regs on teacher caseloads. Autistic support has a small caseload, learning support allows for a bigger caseload. Sometimes the school will push for a category so they have an easier time meeting caseload requirements. I looked up PA regs and they list 9 categories & their caseloads. OHI isn't listed. I know the category is important. The thing is, IEPs are based on what's in the eval report. If there is a need for reading help per the eval and the SLD box isn't checked, the school still has to set goals & remediate the reading issue. The wrong box being checked shouldn't have much effect on your child. So long as the IEP eval is both complete & accurate, all your child's needs should be met by the special instruction & services in the IEP.

You could try asking for a meeting and agreeing to excuse all the required team members who, by contract, are off for the summer. But I don't know who that would leave you with or if the school would even agree to a meeting under those circumstances. You might also try asking for an informal meeting with the director of special education IF s/he is contracted year-round and IF s/he would agree to it.

Are you inferring retaliation? Ask for the policy/standards for determining academic achievement awards. (It's hard to say just knowing the GPA and percentile ranking, as I'm sure every school has different standards and there are all different types of "achievement awards.") If your son meets any of those and didn't receive an award, there's your grounds for retaliation.

My name is Carol Wilson, and I am a special education teacher deeply concerned about recent trends in educational placement practices for students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders (EBD). I am reaching out to advocates to bring attention to a critical issue affecting the well-being and rights of students with EBD nationwide. In recent years, there has been a concerning trend observed across many school districts: the placement of students with EBD in self-contained classrooms designed for students with significant cognitive disabilities without following proper due process procedures. This practice not only violates the rights of these students under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) but also places them at significant risk academically, socially, emotionally, and even physically. Placing students with EBD in self-contained classes without holding a manifestation determination review (MDR) and without considering the individualized needs of these students is a gross violation of their rights. It denies them access to the least restrictive environment and fails to provide the necessary supports and services outlined in their Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). Furthermore, it can have detrimental effects on their academic progress, social interactions, emotional well-being, and physical safety, as well as that of the students appropriately placed in these settings. Moreover, this practice also takes a toll on educators. Special education teachers who are tasked with managing classrooms with students who have significant cognitive disabilities face immense challenges when students with EBD are placed in these settings without appropriate support or training. The increased behavioral demands and potential for physical aggression or violence put educators at risk of burnout, injury, and compromised mental health. As advocates for both students with disabilities and educators, it is imperative that we take action to address this pressing issue. I am calling for a national campaign to raise awareness about the inappropriate placement of students with EBD in self-contained classrooms and to advocate for the rights and well-being of these students and educators. I urge advocates to join this campaign and mobilize its resources to: Advocate for the enforcement of proper due process procedures, including the holding of MDRs, before any decision is made to place a student with EBD in a self-contained classroom. Provide training and support for educators working with students with EBD to ensure they have the necessary skills and resources to meet the diverse needs of their students. Advocate for the implementation of evidence-based practices and interventions to support the inclusion and success of students with EBD in general education settings whenever possible. Call for increased funding and resources for special education programs to ensure that students with EBD receive the individualized support and services they need to thrive. Additionally, I urge advocates to encourage its members and stakeholders to flood the Office for Civil Rights with reports of these violations of students' rights. By bringing attention to these issues at the federal level, we can work towards systemic change and ensure that all students receive the quality education and support they deserve. Together, we can make a difference in the lives of students with EBD and ensure that they are provided with the opportunities and supports they need to succeed. Thank you for your attention to this critical issue, and I look forward to collaborating with you on this important campaign. Sincerely, Carol Wilson, Ph. D.